Prevent Cybercrime with the Zero Trust Model of Cybersecurity

Would you trust just anyone to enter your home? Or would you first confirm that you know them and they have the right to be there?

The Zero Trust Model (ZTM) of security follows a similar principle. The ZTM approach is to be aware of anything entering the company, whether from inside or outside the company’s perimeter.

ZTM simply verifies everything that requires access to the system. The approach does not necessarily decree that every request should be denied. Instead, it asks: Why is access needed? How far? How long?

According to Cyber Security Ventures, cybercrime damages will top $6 trillion by 2021. Little surprise that cybercrime is the trending topic today! This may be just a prediction, but an ominous one indeed. It is a great challenge to prevent cybercrime and avoid this predicted damage. However, we can certainly overcome some part of this. We just need to take the right steps to protect ourselves.

The Zero Trust approach depends on different technology and governance processes to achieve their goals. This model mainly focuses on improving the security of the IT environment of enterprises. This approach varies based on who (the User) is accessing what (SaaS or In-house Applications), as well as from where (Location or IP), how long (Time Restriction) and how (granularity) they want to access it.

There are multiple ways an organization can adopt the Zero Trust Model, and one of the best way to do so is to integrate with an IAM. For example, a well-designed application supports IAM integration and provides MFA by default. Today, all applications have begun to adopt the Zero Trust Model at the design level itself.

SatyaDev Addeppally

SatyaDev Addeppally is the Chief Technology Officer at Akku, where he drives technology strategy and product innovation for the company’s enterprise IAM platform. With a hands-on approach and deep technical expertise, he inspires his teams to build solutions that balance security, scalability, and usability. Under his leadership, Akku continues to evolve as a cutting-edge platform capable of competing with global leaders in the IAM space. Before joining Akku, SatyaDev held leadership roles at BPA Technologies, Raqmiyat, Nihilent, and FCS Software Solutions, managing enterprise-scale projects across BFSI, healthcare, ERP, and hospitality domains. His work in application modernization, digital transformation, and enterprise architecture has enabled organizations worldwide to strengthen IT infrastructure and accelerate growth.

Recent Posts

Building a Defensible Audit Evidence Package for Regulators | Akku

Introduction Every compliance audit, regardless of framework, arrives at the same point: the auditor requests evidence that specific controls operated…

2 days ago

DPDPA Data Principal Rights: What the Technical Infrastructure Behind Each Right Requires

Introduction DPDPA Chapters II and III establish six rights for Data Principals. Each right creates a corresponding technical obligation for…

3 days ago

GDPR Article 25: Data Protection by Design and IAM | Akku

Introduction GDPR Article 25 requires that data protection be built into system architecture by design and that data minimisation be…

2 weeks ago

ISO 27001 A.8.15: User Activity Logs and Authentication Logs Are Not the Same Control

Introduction ISO 27001:2022 Annex A.8.15 requires that logs recording user activities, exceptions, faults, and security events be produced, kept, and…

2 weeks ago

How to Build an Audit Evidence Package That Survives Regulatory Scrutiny

Introduction Every compliance audit, regardless of framework, arrives at the same point: the auditor requests evidence that specific controls operated…

2 weeks ago

SOC 2 CC6: Logical Access Controls and What IAM Must Deliver

Introduction SOC 2 CC6 is the Logical and Physical Access Controls criterion cluster and is where the majority of IAM-relevant…

2 weeks ago