Identity Governance & Administration (IGA)

5 Identity Governance & Administration Mistakes You Should Avoid

Identity governance and administration (IGA) is the policy-based implementation of user identity and access to ensure security and compliance across the IT environment. In IGA, the first step is to remain aware of risks and then follow the best possible practices to mitigate them by improving visibility and accountability.

But that is not enough – you need to avoid making these mistakes as well! 

  • Assuming that identity is just for human resources

In identity governance and administration, it is not just your employees and customers whose identities need to be considered. You need to assign a corporate identity to goods, assets, devices, software – everything you use as part of your business. It is important to define each of their identities and determine what levels of access needs to be assigned to each of them.

  • Disregarding the maturity of your IGA

Before you set up a new IGA policy, you have to know where your organization currently stands. It might turn out that you are already practising different aspects of IGA, albeit indirectly. Factor in your key risk indicators (KRIs) and what you are already doing to address inconsistencies, availability, redundancies, and compliance. Use these as your foundation and build up your IGA from there.

  • Being unaware of IGA solutions

Identity governance products facilitate organizations to define, enforce, review, and audit policies as well as map IAM functions to compliance requirements. A good identity governance solution comes with features like user administration, privileged identity management, role-based identity administration, entitlement management, centralized access request management, access certification, and more.

  • Ignoring your IGA post setup

This goes without saying, but a number of organizations are guilty of ignoring their IGA once the initial setup is complete. You must regularly monitor, review, and refine your approach as an ongoing process. Your organization changes, grows, and evolves and so must your IGA to manage the changing key performance indicators (KPIs) and key risk indicators (KRIs.) For maximum security, expect changes and execute them periodically. Stay agile!

  • Not securing unstructured data

While managing access to applications is important, it is equally important to consider the information contained in each of them. In other words, there is a lot of data within your applications – in the form of emails, presentations, audio/video recordings, photos – that is neither encrypted nor tracked. Any of this data may be sensitive – use an IGA solution to analyze this unstructured data and alert you if there is something you must remove!

Concerned about governance? Ask us how you can streamline identity, access, cybersecurity, and compliance with Akku!

Aravindh Ramachandran

Aravindh is the Chief Operating Officer at Akku, where he drives customer success and ensures world-class service delivery. With a sharp focus on outcomes and a passion for maximizing business value, he plays a central role in scaling Akku’s growth and strengthening customer relationships. Before Akku, Aravindh served as COO of CloudNow Technologies and Hornbill FX, and has held leadership roles at KrissCo, Incite Firebrand Consulting, and D&Z. He began his career in brand strategy and corporate communications, later expanding his expertise to operations, technology services, and consulting. His entrepreneurial journey, which started while still in college, has shaped his ability to guide companies through periods of transformation and exponential growth.

Share
Published by
Aravindh Ramachandran

Recent Posts

IRDAI Item 10: Dormant Account Controls and the Automated Deprovisioning Requirement

Introduction IRDAI ICS Annexure III Item 10 requires that user accounts inactive beyond a defined…

4 weeks ago

ISO 27001 A.5.18 Access Reviews: How to Implement With Structured Evidence

Introduction ISO 27001:2022 Annex A.5.18 requires that access rights be reviewed at regular intervals and…

4 weeks ago

SOC 2 CC5.1 Segregation of Duties: What Technical Enforcement Requires

Introduction SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria CC5.1 requires that the entity selects and develops control…

1 month ago

SEBI CSCRF and Qualified REs: What Higher-Tier Entities Must Implement

Introduction SEBI CSCRF applies to all regulated entities but differentiates requirements by entity tier. Market…

1 month ago

Dormant Account Controls Under SEBI CSCRF: The Access Hygiene Requirement

Introduction SEBI CSCRF PR.AA.S1(G1g) and PR.AA.S1(G1h) require that user accounts inactive beyond a defined threshold…

1 month ago

ISO 27001 A.8.2: Privileged Access Management Requirements and Implementation

Introduction ISO 27001:2022 Annex A.8.2 requires that the allocation and use of privileged access rights…

2 months ago